3,506 research outputs found
Locating-total dominating sets in twin-free graphs: a conjecture
A total dominating set of a graph is a set of vertices of such
that every vertex of has a neighbor in . A locating-total dominating set
of is a total dominating set of with the additional property that
every two distinct vertices outside have distinct neighbors in ; that
is, for distinct vertices and outside , where denotes the open neighborhood of . A graph is twin-free if
every two distinct vertices have distinct open and closed neighborhoods. The
location-total domination number of , denoted , is the minimum
cardinality of a locating-total dominating set in . It is well-known that
every connected graph of order has a total dominating set of size at
most . We conjecture that if is a twin-free graph of order
with no isolated vertex, then . We prove the
conjecture for graphs without -cycles as a subgraph. We also prove that if
is a twin-free graph of order , then .Comment: 18 pages, 1 figur
Transversals in -Uniform Hypergraphs
Let be a -regular -uniform hypergraph on vertices. The
transversal number of is the minimum number of vertices that
intersect every edge. Lai and Chang [J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 50 (1990),
129--133] proved that . Thomass\'{e} and Yeo [Combinatorica
27 (2007), 473--487] improved this bound and showed that .
We provide a further improvement and prove that , which is
best possible due to a hypergraph of order eight. More generally, we show that
if is a -uniform hypergraph on vertices and edges with maximum
degree , then , which proves a known
conjecture. We show that an easy corollary of our main result is that the total
domination number of a graph on vertices with minimum degree at least~4 is
at most , which was the main result of the Thomass\'{e}-Yeo paper
[Combinatorica 27 (2007), 473--487].Comment: 41 page
Location-domination in line graphs
A set of vertices of a graph is locating if every two distinct
vertices outside have distinct neighbors in ; that is, for distinct
vertices and outside , , where
denotes the open neighborhood of . If is also a dominating set (total
dominating set), it is called a locating-dominating set (respectively,
locating-total dominating set) of . A graph is twin-free if every two
distinct vertices of have distinct open and closed neighborhoods. It is
conjectured [D. Garijo, A. Gonzalez and A. Marquez, The difference between the
metric dimension and the determining number of a graph. Applied Mathematics and
Computation 249 (2014), 487--501] and [F. Foucaud and M. A. Henning.
Locating-total dominating sets in twin-free graphs: a conjecture. The
Electronic Journal of Combinatorics 23 (2016), P3.9] respectively, that any
twin-free graph without isolated vertices has a locating-dominating set of
size at most one-half its order and a locating-total dominating set of size at
most two-thirds its order. In this paper, we prove these two conjectures for
the class of line graphs. Both bounds are tight for this class, in the sense
that there are infinitely many connected line graphs for which equality holds
in the bounds.Comment: 23 pages, 2 figure
A Greedy Partition Lemma for Directed Domination
A directed dominating set in a directed graph is a set of vertices of
such that every vertex has an adjacent vertex
in with directed to . The directed domination number of , denoted
by , is the minimum cardinality of a directed dominating set in .
The directed domination number of a graph , denoted , which is
the maximum directed domination number over all orientations of
. The directed domination number of a complete graph was first studied by
Erd\"{o}s [Math. Gaz. 47 (1963), 220--222], albeit in disguised form. In this
paper we prove a Greedy Partition Lemma for directed domination in oriented
graphs. Applying this lemma, we obtain bounds on the directed domination
number. In particular, if denotes the independence number of a graph
, we show that .Comment: 12 page
- …